Why Einstein was wrong about the theory of relativity.

 Einstein was wrong: just ask ChatGPT why, it knows!

Einstein started his career as, and I quote... 'A lowly patent clerk' but let's try to put this into context for the sake of clarity. At the turn of the 20th century, when jobs and careers were primarily based in heavy industry, young Einstein was absorbing cutting edge physics literature in order to review, contribute, edit and grant patents in physics. He was reading the bleeding edge material of the era and had to understand it fully; a genuine tribute to his intelligence. All things said and done, I would say 'lowly' is a somewhat demeaning term for Einstein's position... but that doesn't make his theories accurate, they are... theoretical.

Firstly, let's put some definition to the vocabulary of Einstein’s equation as interpretations often differ; I will also clarify my own interpretation and understanding in practical terms.

For the sake of science, Energy is defined as ‘the ability, or capacity, to do work’. For me, that’s a little too ‘loose’ to be precise and scientific. My personal ability to lift a rock above my head is a 2 whilst someone else’s is a 3… just doesn’t quite fit precisely into the understanding of Energy, per say… but we all get the concept. In real terms there is no exact and precise definition of Energy because nobody really knows what energy is, we just understand some of the properties surrounding it… so we have  free license to play with our definition/s however, I will say this lady has it nailed down as close as anyone can.

Very simplified: there are several forms of energy that primarily fall into 2 categories;

• Potential, or stored energy.
• Kinetic, or moving energy.

Typical form factors of energy are;

1. Chemical
2. Electrical
3. Mechanical
4. Thermal
5. Light
6. Sound
7. Nuclear
8. Gravitational
9. Moving fields (?) … this is key

Energy has the following 4 properties:

1. It can be transferred from one thing to another
2. It can be transformed from one form to another
3. We can store energy
4. We can transport energy

Let’s amalgamate these basic facts and principals into the theory of relativity by trying to first understand how Einstein perceived the equation. He broke the universe down into 2 dimensions consisting of Space and Time, a conceptualisation which I believe falls short in reality; the universe being 2 dimensional. Einstein represented Space by the Mass of an object (= Density/Volume) and Time as speed (= Distance/Time) in that he utilised size and the fastest thing known to man at that time… the speed of light (squared), as references.

I believe his entire perception to be deficient in numerous factors, but this is not to take anything away from Einstein, he knew he was wrong… he was an incredibly intelligent theorist. He understood the concept of failing forward; whoever was to understand this more than he, needed to prove his theory incorrect, which was virtually impossible at that time. He knew 'Spooky action at a distance', as an explicative of entanglement, explains more; he was stating that he did not know either, which is no shame. The whole concept of energy is HIGHLY complex and intertwined. When asked what it was like to be a genius, Einstein’s response was always absolute: “I don’t know, go and ask Nikola Tesla”… he was BANG on the money!

The theory of relativity doesn’t consider environmental factors that would affect 'Energy', such as temperature and pressure (nor consciousness; very complicated and relative). In addition, Einstein used a single energy form factor to define the relativity… Light. I believe he missed the fact that Thermal energy in the form of Temperature is equally significant, if not more so… in that 'Energy vibration' increases with heat towards evaporation (vaporization) and slows towards solidification or freezing, making density relative. Less temperature = less perceived vibration or movement of the energy. Hence thermal force energy, equated as temperature, is definitely as relative as the energy attained due to the speed of light. In addition, Density changes with speed and reduces to zero at the speed of light, making Mass = 0. Anything multiplied by zero = 0. Therefore E=0 at the speed of light which is incorrect.

The equation E=mc², often utilizes the analogy of a train or a spaceship to explain the concept. However, this analogy is flawed due to the inherent properties of velocity and inertia. Energy, unlike a train, is not subject to these properties and simply exists. For the equation to be truly relative, one would need to already be traveling at the speed of light. Density and environment can alter the relativity of the equation in real-life scenarios, yet they are not accounted for in Einstein’s original formulation. Density, in particular, is dependent on electron field flow and can be affected by changes in speed. According to the theory, as speed approaches that of light, density should decrease to zero this energy is represented by a photon.

Nikola Tesla states, ‘When thinking about the secrets of the universe, think; Energy, Vibration and Frequency’. Einstein may have overlooked multiple aspects and nuances of energy properties; transference, transformation and transport, particularly with respect to velocity and inertia of Mass, or the ability to amplify energy form factors during execution,
(*doubtful he overlooked it).

This is demonstrated by the transfer of energy from a single falling domino … multiplying into a crescendo of power the more dominos you add to the configuration, but also importantly is the exact configuration that you put the dominos into, similar in theory to  electricity traveling through copper motor coils; the shape is relative. Velocity, and the Density of the mass are all significant in making the entire concept of energy as complex, as it is intwined… even to grasp the concept of what Einstein was attempting to explain is no small task.

Nikola Tesla on the other hand, pure Genius. And taking on some of his guiding principles relating to his concepts surrounding 3, 6 and 9… the universe operations seem (to me at least) such that: Everything within the universe (i.e. its contents) lie within 3 realms of existence consisting of;

• A Field, delivered in
• Waveform by
• a Particle.

The double slit experiment is a partial demonstration of this; light proves it; and when a graviton is finally identified and isolated… it will confirm as much. 3 dimensions of Energy; surmised as Field, Force and Function.

My first statement to the contrary with Einstein would be "The density of the mass must enter into the theory of relativity equations" …whereby

Density = Mass/Volume.

This becomes more explanatory with respect to Einstein’s comment ‘spooky action at a distance’ when referring to Entanglement. The inclusion of Density, (or the distance and field pattern of an electron from the nucleus) can be better explained metaphorically by the falling balloon, basketball and bowling ball experiments, with respect to gravity on earth and zero gravity, in space.

Density must enter the equation as it what differentiates between a wooden table and the metal pot that lies upon it. If you vibrate a bowling ball, a basketball and a balloon, the results and consequences differ significantly; as the balloon will invariably and inevitably ‘pop’ with energy first.

 Hence we could be forgiven to conclude:

Energy = (Mass / Volume) x C²

However… the university of Tennessee have proven that the speed of sound is actually faster than the speed of light, by a factor of 90 degrees. To illustrate this: think about tapping your finger on a table… it gives a sound & frequency, plus you can visibly see this being made. Now consider tapping your finger at the speed of light; you would not see it. Logic should dictate that the sound has to be made before it is seen and therefore the sound energy must proceed that of light; Tennessee proved this. We can therefore deduce that the speed of sound should replace the speed of light in Einstein’s equation as 'the fastest thing' but I would further pose....
Q. Why can't we simply define the perceived velocity timeline in a ‘classification'  aimed at covering the entirety of the time coefficient, i.e. Time itself … such that:

Energy = Density x Time

We can now add environmental circumstances to the equation timeline as appropriate at leisure … such that light, sound, pressure, gravity and temperature as energy forces unto themselves, all have a 'relative' effect... and are therefore relative, proportionately. The intertwined nature of energy dictates that field and force factors require, or dictate different, yet quantifiable results… these being relative to the quantity and quality of light, sound, pressure and the temperature that the environment facilitates…

I would therefore conclude that Einstein missed out at least one dimension in his equation… which is now demonstrably incorrect when we incorporate todays knowledge and data that was unavailable to Einstein. His theories will always remain a work in progress, done deliberately, until humanity acquires the knowledge to refine his works and research into a more precise definition of energy. Einstein definitely laid the foundation for the understanding and future comprehension of energy.

Energy = [Density x Time] + Environmental Factors

Below is a mind map of my perceptions relating to the topic of energy for you to review. In the unlikely event that you would like an actual copy of the knowledge base mind map file, drop me an Email via our contact form. 

Nikola Tesla on the other hand … was a world apart. I will demonstrate how so, with the methodology I believe he intended to use to transmit free, wireless energy to the masses. The following video relates to the conduction of electricity in cables. Pay very close attention to the diagrams shown from around the 9^th minute into the video and always bear in mind, question everything (including and especially, me).

The video and diagrams certainly insinuate that you do not need the copper cable in order for electricity, an energy form factor, to flow. The copper simply facilitates the ability for the fields to exist.  If you remove the effects of the metallurgy or conductive material from the diagrams you should be able to envisage that mimicking the exact electron field and flow pattern, in theory, would allow for one to remove the cable and extract energy from thin air… providing you can duplicate the flow patterns, of course. This theory illustrates the probability of energy transmission (at the correct Electro Magnetic Field frequency and form factor) could facilitate energy extraction from the air within a specified range of the power transmitted.

Taking this one step further and still in theory… If this were undertaken utilising photons, which have no mass, the concept also stands true in principal. In that you should be able to take energy directly from light itself if one can mimic the correct field flow patterns…and to add more complexity; in turn, light travels at different wavelengths, in 3 main colours, (RGB). Hence, you may now begin to see how complicated and intwined ‘understanding energy’ is, the relavence of 3, 6 and 9 plus how difficult the task that Einstein took on, was. A work in progress for all of humanity to ponder and expand upon. 

Well done Albert! 

The concept of Infinity however, is slightly more daunting and not quite so straightforward … but let’s tackle that one for fun, by first defining it in real term.

Infinity is that which is boundless, endless, or larger than any natural number. It is often denoted by the infinity symbol ∞

A rough estimated definition of Infinity could be interpreted as everything and it’s opposite moving forwards and backwards, in time and space, forever and not. Or you could state it as simply being the difference between something and nothing, which in real terms is infinite. However, to do so provides mathematical boundaries within which to work and calculate, theoretically. Or, to translate this into mathematical terms: Infinity is the difference between 1 & 0 and back again.

∞ = 1 / 0

However, infinity is more than this of course… because it’s also in opposition, sidewards and upside down:

∞ = [1 / 0 + 0 / 1]

However, infinity is so much more than this …

∞ = +/-√ [1 / 0 + 0 / 1] ²

However, infinity is so much more than that….

∞ = +/-√ [1 / 0 + 0 / 1] ² +/- ∞

If you could follow that...

it's plain mental!!!

Spread the word, VOTE LOONY: DONATE TODAY!